|       | 
| In Media Resistant:  | 
| Not long after Tony Conrad’s death in April 2016, a series of
five videos appeared on YouTube. (1) Filmed and uploaded by Richard Wicka, these direct-to-camera, question-and-answer sessions
recorded privately in 2005 feature Conrad recalling early memories, reflecting
on past encounters and even anticipating the persistence of the videos beyond the
end of his life:
 | 1. ‘Tony Conrad unedited pt 1 of 5’. | 
| So, you motherfuckers, you’re out there watching me. And I’m dead. So, what do you think? How is it? Cause I feel fine and you’re sitting on your asses watching me on video after I’m gone. Do I feel comfortable about this relationship to you? No. Why should I feel comfortable about it? (2) | 2. For Conrad’s discussion of ‘coming to terms with your own death’, see ‘Tony Conrad unedited pt 4’. | 
| Conrad makes an archaeological dig toward the earliest recorded audiovisions: referring to May Irwin, star of Thomas Edison’s
silent film The Kiss (1896) and the
scandal it caused, while considering what groundswells are being brought about
in the present culture by new technologies. As with so many of Conrad’s
undertakings, the videos appear to have been noticed initially by relatively
few. Watching these videos we are provoked into a contemplation of the shifting
relationship between the past and the present, the self and the other, through developing
media. Media, history, power and community: these are key terms in Conrad’s
work.
 | 
| 
 | 
| The posthumous uploads do not seem to have been contrived simply
as a ‘boo’ from the beyond. They were a continuation of Wicka’s ongoing project of documenting individual life stories. (3) Yet Conrad’s own
concern with the history and future of media no doubt provoked a deep consideration
as to how the text-image-sound constellations of contemporary, online media
would subsume the fact of his death – the videos were made shortly after he had
been diagnosed with prostate cancer. (4) The funny, moving and self-reflexive
qualities of the five encounters, and their emergence online within seven days
of Conrad’s passing, were in keeping with a decades-long, head-on engagement
with media. They might also be included within the number of Conrad’s own works
that utilise the mode of audience address, exemplified in the video In Line (1986).
 | 3. See the Five Minute Video Series, shot in the same style as the interviews with Conrad. 4. In using the term ‘contemporary media’ here, it is worth pointing out that YouTube was launched in the same year as Wicka’s videos were recorded. | 
| The mise en scène of Wicka’s videos, with Conrad seated against a curtained backdrop and talking straight at
the camera/viewer (though coaxed by Wicka’s questioning), is strangely reminiscent of the initiation videos of the millenarian
cult Heaven’s Gate. While no doubt unintended, the similarity is apt here, not
only because that group’s leader, Marshall Applewhite,
also recorded video messages presaging the conditions of his afterlife – albeit
before the notorious mass suicide of the cult’s members – but, more
specifically, because another consistent focus of Conrad’s wide-ranging work is
the nature of control. (5)
 
 
 | 5. For an example of the Heaven’s Gate initiation videos, see ‘Last Chance to Evacuate Planet Earth (Before it is Recycled)’, The writer Branden W Joseph has already identified control as a central concern of Conrad’s, although his excellent book Beyond the Dream Syndicate covers only the period up to The Flicker. 
 
 
 | 
| Conrad probed and adapted the methodologies of hypnosis,
      persuasion and other forms of influence as a means of upending different strategies
      of control and affording breakthroughs; whether at the micro level, such as a
      modulated sense of personal autonomy, even a shift in artistic taste; or at the
      macro level, by institutional critique and art-historical revisionism. The
      terms by which the individual, community or culture at large might cut against
      the conditioning effects of the media or other systems was a recurring characteristic of such a seemingly disparate catalogue of work. So
      it seems only fitting that Wicka’s videos should
      present us with a Tony Conrad very much alive and speaking about his own life
      and death at a time when obituarists were sitting
      down to cap off his life story and work history.
   *
             Conrad’s longheld interest in media, power
        and personal autonomy were articulated through an array of media; foremost
        music, film and video but also teaching, writing and community engagement – the
        latter in New York city and Buffalo, in particular. Conrad
        utilised these media to an astonishing extent during his lifetime, clearly
        stating the grounds of his operations, including them in the format of essays
        and combined performances and talks, while somehow remaining largely
        inscrutable; by accounts generous with collaborators, students and friends, yet
        ever resistant to the co-option of identity by technological or authoritarian
        imperatives, deeply knowledgeable as he was of the role of media in shaping
        societal commonplaces and individual behaviour. This trait of resistance may even
        account for the relatively scant reference to Conrad in the culture of film and
        music beyond his first film The Flicker (1966), and his recorded collaboration with German band Faust, Outside the Dream Syndicate (1973).
   | 
| Though Conrad’s work has been referred to in the context of
      minimalist composition and structural film, it is often overlooked just how his
      art rubs against expectations within these critically assembled genres.
      Moreover, commentaries on Conrad often misinterpret the concerns that animate
      such physically affective audiovisions, and underacknowledge how consistently political Conrad’s work
      is, conveying an unabashed activist spirit. (6) Sometimes this was manifested in
      the most obvious public fashion, as with his public protests alongside Henry Flynt against what they perceived to be programmes of ‘cultural
      imperialism’ within prominent art institutions in the 1960s. Sites included
      Lincoln Center for Performing Arts and the
      Metropolitan Museum of Art, with specific antagonism towards Karlheinz Stockhausen when the composer was visiting the
      States. (7)
   Through academic research into the simultaneous developments within
        the orchestra and military regimentation in eighteenth-century France under the
        reign of Louis XIV, investigated in his long-term project on the work of court composer
        Jean-Baptiste Lully, Conrad sought other, less
        obvious routes of resistance such as modified tuning of the violin and style of
        performance. (8) Conrad’s responses to historical junctures and present
        cultural phenomena alike, shaped the development of
        his compositions, films and writing. These aimed to reframe the past and
        mobilise grassroots media practices, so as to uncover the potential for non-normative
        experiences, an expanded awarenesss of compositional
        effects and to encourage anti-authoritarian social organisation. (9)
   A throughline which runs adjacent to
        Conrad’s interest in authority is his attention to psychological manipulation,
        and the interior experience of shifting one’s perspective. Whether by way of
        linguistic content, sonic or graphic animation, Conrad was fascinated by the
        phenomenological and psychological effects of sociocultural structures, and the media technologies that might operate within these
        structures. (10)
   
 | 6. ‘Even his early “iconic” works are, in a way, Trojan horses.
      The minimal music, long drones, experimental film – he
      was already, from the beginning, fucking with those definitions from within.
      And the Yellow Movies, which came a
      few years later, were also a biting critique of minimalism and structural
      cinema – when he’s often thought of as a champion or master of those styles.
      And the minimal music was already an architectural attack of music structure.
      It wasn’t just about zoning out and going to slumberland
      and listening to it.’ Andrew Lampert and Jay Sanders,
  ‘Tick ...Tick ...Tick ...Tony Time’ in Michael Cohen (ed.), Tony Conrad: Doing the City/Urban Community
    Interventions (New York: 80WSE Press, 2013), p. 12.
   7. Describing Flynt’s justifications
        for these actions, Branden W Joseph writes: ‘The
        reason put forth for protesting Stockhausen, however, was quite specific: his
        ability to produce legitimating concepts (“invent ‘scientific’ Laws”) that
        perpetuate Western music’s pretension to advancement and supremacy’. Joseph, Beyond the Dream Syndicate (Brooklyn:
        Zone Books, 2008), p. 199. Conrad: ‘I'm not going to go into that message right
        now; it's enough to say it was about cultural imperialism, and would have been
        clearly understood today by anyone interested in post-colonialism, but was about
        25 years ahead of its time’; interview with Brian Duguid,        EST Magazine, June 1996.
         8. An audio extract from this multimedia project, Inducting Lully, can be heard online here.
         This track was originally released by Table of the Elements
        in 2006.
         9. Speaking with Jay Sanders in 2005, Conrad admitted: ‘It was
        completely beyond any realistic expectation for me and Jack Smith and Henry Flynt to picket Stockhausen on the basis that European
        culture was a kind of neo-Nazi infiltration of the institutional music
        environment in the United States, and to think that our symbolic action would
        convince people that they should stop composing and start doing something
        else’. Bomb, no. 92
        (Summer 2005).
         10. See Conrad’s essay ‘Let’s Understanda
        Our Own Propaganda’.
         | 
| The 1977 video Concord
      Ultimatum is an early example of Conrad’s direct-to-camera approach to
      media. Shot over one night in the Concord Hotel, the filmmaker addresses the
      technological apparatus recording him in an attempt to gain an insight into its
      intentions, imbuing it with a sovereignty that is acknowledged and negotiated
      with. He later wrote: ‘Using the camera itself as a surrogate for the audience,
      I shot Concord Ultimatum on video,
      threatening the camera lest it not act correctly and generate the right
      images’. (11)
   *
             Conrad was attuned to the uneasy frequencies of America,
        scrutinising its networks and its signals, the waves of protest and counter-protest.
        From the 1960s onwards he involved himself in the activities of downtown New
        York as a way of articulating his social and artistic concerns. In the case of the long duration music
        group the Theatre of Eternal Music – with which he was involved along with John Cale, La Monte Young and Marian Zazeela – Conrad was quite literally tuned to the city: at times the players’
        intonation was organised around a 120-cycle aquarium motor hum, in tune with
        the 60 Hz power feed of NYC. (12) The group sought to dissolve the hierarchy of
        composer and audience, allowing the two to commune in the experience of
        sustained listening. In addition, Conrad
        was closely involved with Jack Smith and the Fluxus artists, the members of the Velvet Underground and Andy Warhol’s superstars – a
        melting pot of provocative media- and mind-expanding performers who overturned
        expectations as far as artistic tradition and normative gender were concerned. Across the following years, Conrad would
        continue to jam signals, change the tonic, boost the
        contrast wherever his own practices directed him – with a view to renegotiating
        the terms on which the individual, media and society might intersect.
   In 2008 I encountered Conrad twice, only a few weeks apart: first
        above ground in Tate Modern’s Turbine Hall, unleashing earth-trembling noises using
        vinyl records, phonograph tonearms and a power drill,
        as well as flickering visuals, in one of London’s prestigious art galleries;
        then beneath the streets of Tokyo performing in a musical duo for around 200
        people in an underground club. Almost uniquely, Conrad was able to move between
        these cultural strata, working with music, film and other visual art forms
        while finding surprising new pathways to reconnect
        them all.
   | 11. Tony Conrad, ‘Retrospect I’, in Woody Vasulka
  & Peter Weibel (eds), Buffalo
    Heads (Cambridge, Massachussetts: MIT Press,
      2008), p. 548.
   
 
 
 12. See La Monte Young, ‘Notes on the Theatre of Eternal Music and The Tortoise, His Dreams and Journeys’, 2000. 
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
| It is with reference to these guiding concerns of Conrad’s that
his defining work to date, The Flicker,
ought to be more widely recognised. The filmmaker was keen at the time of its
production not only to transpose harmonic theories to visual patterns, almost
an attempt at ‘seen music’; but also to investigate the effects that these might
have on the brain – part of a wider investigation into stroboscopic effects,
hallucination and other perceptual phenomena; as well as in the possibilities
of using the work as a matte for narrative films,
foremost those of his friend Jack Smith. Conrad later exhibited a ‘Flicker
matte’ as a separate visual artwork. The
Flicker, composed entirely of black and white frames, reveals itself on
closer scrutiny to be not so black and white at all. Typically referred to as a
minimalist film, its conceptual valence and visceral effect could not be more
maximal. (13) It is intriguing to discover, in tracing this interest in
psychological affect, visual form and power from
Conrad’s earliest work that, during the Second World War, Conrad’s father was a
colleague of the noted dazzle camofleur Everett
Warner, whose military designs used deceptive black and white patterns. (14)
 
 
 
 
 | 13. ‘The Flicker arose out of a much wider and more diverse investigation into techniques of
      perceptual and neurophysiological stimulation – techniques
      including film and tape loops, broadcast television and other deployments of
      cathode-ray-tube technology, telephone transmission, ultrasound, gestalt
      psychology, photo-signal alternators, and pharmaceutical hallucinogens’. BJoseph, Beyond the
        Dream Syndicate, p. 301.
   14. See Roy R Behren’s, ‘Everett Warner
        (1877–1963): Ship Camouflage Artist’,
        2009.
         
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
| Conrad’s intensive work with a multitude of media formats also
      reminds us that assumed medium specificities might just be illusory. The
      labour-intensive Film Feedback (1974)
      manages to create the effect of a video loop using only the apparatus of film development
      and projection. The Yellow Movies (1972-73),
      shown for one night at the Millennium Film Workshop in 1973, were installed
      like paintings but were intended as movie screens on which the show never stops
  – they have more recently been exhibited in art galleries in the US and Europe,
      the emulsion used to paint the screens’ ever changing hue with exposure to
      light. Using only black and white lines, printed onto the film strip according to patterns following that of Benham’s top, in Straight
        and Narrow (with Beverley Grant Conrad, 1970) Conrad prompted colour perceptions in the viewer. Similarly,
      Conrad found new potential in apparently exhausted materials: taking a hammer
      to a roll of outdated, brittle celluloid and re-assembling the shards for 4-X Attack (1973); subjecting the same
      product to shock for Electrocuted 4-X (1974). And putting a new slant on film preservation in the Pickled Film series (for example, Pickled 3M-150, 1974). Curried 7302 (1973) afforded a novel method for Conrad to continue
      to exist as a working artist while undertaking domestic duties during his son’s
      first years. Substituting celluloid for onion in a home cooking recipe for
      curry, then screening the resulting ‘dish’, Conrad
      interrupted the standard procedures of house husband, filmmaker and projector
      at one and the same time.
   *
         Conrad was well aware of the speed at which media might entrench
        themselves and reiterated the necessity of creating feedback as an act of
        political will. One ear-opening manifestation of the immediacy of the media is the audio recording Bryant Park Moratorium Rally. Documenting a 1969 public gathering
        in New York in opposition to US involvement in Vietnam, and featuring such
        celebrity guest speakers as Woody Allen, Conrad set up two microphones in his
        apartment. One microphone was hung outside the apartment window to capture the
        noise down the street where the protest was occurring in real time, while
        another mic was placed by the television. The resulting
        two-channel mix confirms the near-instantaneous flow of the televisual signal, with the reportage of the rally and the passionate imploring of the platform
        speakers reaching the tape reel before the sounds from the street below. The
        recording was first released online over thirty years later, on the eve of the
        US invasion of Iraq in 2003.  
   | 
| Much of Conrad’s work can be seen as an encouragement to
      individual animation, an expression of a desire to control the terms of one’s emotional
      and intellectual experience as far as
        possible. Addressing the relationships of control between the artist, the
      exhibitor and the audience, composer and listener, teacher and student, and
      citizen and government, Conrad found inventive strategies of interruption. With
      musical compositions such as Four Violins (1964), Conrad rebuked the Western harmonic tradition as a whole and, with
      powerful effect, posited an alternate system of intonation both sonically
      arresting and devoid of such mystical flimflam as the notion of the ‘harmony of
      the spheres’, which (as he saw it) actually helped to underwrite elitist social
      arrangements in nominally democratic states from the time of Pythagoras. (15)  
   One of Conrad’s late appearances, in the framework of his
        teaching role, was to be filmed reading out student assessments of his tutelage
        at SUNY Buffalo. Circulated across social media under the heading ‘Tony Conrad
        reads his Rate My Professor reviews’, how many viewers knew that the professor
        had already skewered the time-consuming job of marking class assignments in his
        video Grading Tips for Teachers (2003)? (16)
         
 | 15. ‘For example, Tony railed against what he saw as the
      tyranny of the Pythagorean worldview, whereby the proportions found in the
      intervals were elevated to a cosmic hierarchy, a divinely endowed “harmony of
      the spheres”, fixed for all time. While tuning systems have changed over the
      centuries, this philosophy has a long trajectory in Western classical music’.
      Mario Diaz de Leon, ‘Tony Conrad 1940–2016: Systems of Oppression’, The Wire (April 2016),
       16. ‘UB Professors Read Their “Rate My Professor” Reviews’. 
 
 
 
 | 
| Meeting, unintimidated, the anonymity
of the bilious comment feeds and user reviews of websites, the video again
reflects a continuance of Conrad’s methodology, by which both established and
nascent paradigms – especially those that involve media – can be subjected to critical
intervention. An essay devoted to this issue was published by Conrad in 2004. ‘Process
Communications and the Construction of Advocacy’ concerns the community-emboldening
potential of controlling one’s self-representation, describing methods similar
to the ‘pacing and leading’ used in Neuro-Linguistic
Programming. (17) This concern is evident in Studio of the Streets (1991–1993), the cable access programme
Conrad made in Buffalo in collaboration with Cathy Steffan.
Interviewing members of the public outside the city’s town hall, the filmmakers
were hopeful about stimulating public discourse and addressing social concerns.
 
 
 | 
 
 17. See here. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
| *
             Suspicious of the tendency of media to shape thoughts and
        feelings, and to guide action, Conrad spent his working life rooting out the
        pernicious ways in which the spectacle permeates a given social context. This
        rather typical posture of being against control, antagonistic towards
        authoritative structures and petrified art-historical narratives is coincident
        with a continual interest in changing one’s mind. As such, there is a
        provocative question that shapes much of Conrad’s work: whether the event of a
        change of mind is an effect of a coercive external influence or the drafting,
        by the subject, of sensory and intellectual stimuli into a process of
        uncovering previously unforeseen experiences for oneself. Can lines even be drawn between the two? Conrad certainly promoted
        the change of mind as far as personal taste was concerned:
   | 
| It had always, since my earliest encounters
      with contemporary art, been my experience that the greatest pleasures and the
      most profound surprises that came from art were those that flowed from a
      wholesale change of outlook. Finding that the thing one most despised became revalued as the most cherished, that the thing least
      understood became transparent, that the thing most easily enjoyed was revealed
      as maudlin, that the thing most fervently believed was upended – these were the
      most exhilarating moments that cultural engagements could provide. (18) | 
 
 18. Tony Conrad, ‘Retrospect II’ in Buffalo Heads, p. 554. | 
| This sense of individual epiphany can be compared with the
investigations of Conrad’s little-known army project, Beholden to Victory (1980–2007). It features artists Mike Kelley
and Tony Oursler, and employed strict ideas for
angles of shooting (from high and low) as well as for spectator roleplay, dividing the audience into ‘army officers’ and ‘civilians’
to examine the effects this might have – a ‘Stanford Cinema Experiment’ or
‘Cine-Milgram Experiment’, if you will. And with the
video In Line, Conrad is seen talking
to the viewer and attempting to gain dominance over their thoughts through the
use of prompts and simple props.
 
 
 | 
| In a short article on Conrad for The Wire, Alan Licht remarks: ‘It is
      ironic that a great deal of the interest surrounding Conrad’s music lies in its
      rescue from obscurity (and his own stance that in some cases it had been
      suppressed by others), yet he granted only limited access to much of his work
      in other media’. (19) This is a point worth considering in more depth. There is
      an often thrilling sense, when immersed in Conrad’s audiovisual work, of exquisite
      gamesmanship; that Conrad is finding for himself and us ways we might get
      around the strict sequences laid out by others. (20) For example:
   
        
        1.    
        
        The suppression of the recordings of the
          Theatre of Eternal Music by his former collaborator La Monte Young (referred to
          by Licht) led Conrad to recompose music from the
          period and find a visual analogue in the form of a shadow projection when
          playing that music in a live setting – a counterpoint, too, to Conrad’s usual
          brightly coloured attire.
   
        
        2.    
        
        Sceptical of the dead end towards which he
          saw the structuralist filmmakers in Europe and the US
          heading in the 1970s, the ‘food films’ and Yellow
            Movies were, among other things, a means by which Conrad sought to push the
          medium to its limits of duration and apparatus-less-ness.
          Describing his intention to ‘play out an endgame in the (then doggedly ongoing)
          progressive exploration of the formal boundaries of cinema’, (21) Conrad was
          mindful of what he felt to be years and creative lives wasted by subtle extension
          and modification of momentary trends in the art world.
   But in tandem with this liberating principle, there is indeed an
        unavoidable sense that Conrad wants to achieve a kind of hermeticism for his work, resistant as he seemed to any potential for additional commentary
        or augmentation that was not already built into his own initiative. Early written
        compositions demonstrate a similar circularity. His Bowed Film (1974) mixes musical performance and film projection in
        a way that restricted the experience of the images on the film strip to a
        single individual: Conrad himself. And Conrad’s films were rarely screened
        without his own presence and accompanying reminiscences.
   | 19. Alan Licht, ‘Tony Conrad
      1940–2016: Breaking The Frame’, The Wire, April 2016.
      
       20. Conrad was a graduate in mathematics; both his
        collaborative work in the Theatre of Eternal Music and his solo musical
        compositions reflect an advanced knowledge of number ratios.
         
 
 
 
 21. Tony Conrad, email to Experimental Film Discussion List, March 2001. For further context on the development of Conrad’s ‘food films’, see Branden W. Joseph, The Roh and the Cooked (Berlin: August Verlag, 2012). 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
| This perception is doubled when one considers Conrad’s desire to
adopt the voice of the critic within his own work:
           | 
| I began to wonder, with greater focus, what
      or who was running the cultural game – was it the economics of culture
      institutions, or was it the artists, or the critics, or the theorists whose
      disciplines (such as philosophy, anthropology, linguistics, Marxism, etc.)
      supported the critics? As I had already been striving to empty out the works
      and their institutional inertia, I felt that perhaps a different function of
      the work might be effective, if the work could co-opt the voice of the critic
      or theorist. (22) | 
 
 22. Tony Conrad, ‘Retrospect I’, in Buffalo Heads, p. 548.
         | 
| To resist the expropriation of his work, to take on the voice of
      the critic, to barricade what he perceived to be blind alleyways down which
      peers were heading, might suggest a paranoid and controlling sensibility; at
      the same time, Conrad was unquestionably breaking boundaries and achieving
      dazzling, rich results in the art that he created. This indicated a clear
      desire to avoid others dictating the rules of play, while maintaining an
      enthusiasm for sharing, with his usual joviality, his insights.
       It seems reasonable, then, to consider Conrad’s ‘endgame’ works,
        and tendency to return to previous projects within new social and technological
        contexts, as an indication of a preference for being part of a culture that
        thrives and changes, that promotes individual creativity, as opposed to one
        that solidifies into a repertoire of uninspiring attractions, bland copyists
        and dull, theoretical baggage. Pressing beyond the activities of those
        postmodernists and deconstructionists of the 1970s and ‘80s who happily
        dissolved the past, the author, meaning and value, Conrad sought to reframe
        those confluences of events and figures that define key historical moments, in
        order to imagine what other routes might have been taken. This return to the
        past in order to reconceive the present therefore reflects
        not a cynically gleeful destruction of tradition – in terms of artistic form or
        social organisation – but an encouragement to historical understanding as a way
        of opening new avenues of experience and communion.
   *
             As Marshall McLuhan and Guy Debord foresaw, contemporary experience has become ever more mediated since the 1960s.
        From his earliest experiences making film and music, Conrad remained cognisant
        of relationships of control, and where the potential lay for each artist or
        spectator to interrupt the program in ways that not only had a transformative
        physiological and intellectual effect, but also short-circuited the mechanisms
        that manufacturers, broadcasters and authors in their different ways sought – either
        intentionally, or as the unintended result of being embroiled in a larger, vampiric network of transmission and transaction – to
        impose on the individual.
   Tony Conrad was, for almost six decades, involved in media, in
        its immediate forms, as well as
        remaining attentive to its archival and historical representations. Almost
        hidden in plain sight – despite his boldly colourful dress – Conrad was excited
        to see real paradigm shifts. He played them out as if they were still possible,
        in a culture that is, by and large, happy to stay tuned to the same waveband. He has even beaten this writer to the
        punch, ventriloquising so incisively the external
        critical voice, dissolving the limiting intentions of the biographer, the auteurist, and the obituarist.
        Conrad throws us back on ourselves and the categories we so enthusiastically seek
        to impose, so that we might just find a more surprising and illuminating way
        forward. As he says to the camera at
        the Concord Hotel: ‘All I expect is imagination’.
   | 
| © Yusef Sayed and LOLA, 2016. Cannot be reprinted without permission of the author and editors. |