|       | 
| Two Dollar Movie: Introduction  
             | 
| This writing game began at the Dutch magazine De Filmkrant,
      which kindly offered to celebrate the 100th column of World Wide Angle, my series that has been running since October
      2007 (issue 292). I invited 60 friends and associates in the worlds of film,
      art and literature to compose a short text: describing some unusual, wondrous,
        perhaps entirely unknown movie stumbled upon somewhere – on sale, in a market,
        in a discarded box, on a forgotten shelf, in another country … and bought for a
        tiny price (upper limit of two dollars or Euros or whichever national
        denomination was appropriate). Not every respondent followed the rules exactly
        but that, too, is part of the game. What matters as much as any particular title
        unearthed, or the incidental formation of particular little ‘genres’ of
        commonality across the 60 entries, is the imperative to tell the tale, to give
        an account, of this encounter of an
        individual spectator with an individual film.
   
         The elements
        of surprise and strangeness are crucial to this project of encounter. We live
        in a time when, thanks especially to the Internet, ‘consensus canons’ invade
        every corner of film culture, from commercial releases to ‘niche cults’, from
        film festival fare to academic curricula. It is getting harder to find room to
        manoeuvre outside these endless cultural prescriptions, and the ‘peer pressure’
        they inevitably bring down on our shoulders. So many critics and programmers
        new to the scene – no matter how naturally radical their sensibility or wild
        their taste – are consumed by the demand to know what their comrades and
        mentors already know, and to contribute to the formation of an agreed-on,
        evolving canon. (This much was evident in the many responses for and against the
        recent, pointless ‘BBC Culture’ poll of the 21st century’s best
        films so far.) The ethos of discovery,
        so central to the drive and history of cinephilia – a
        discovery sometimes, it’s true, accompanied by weird forms of myopia, such as
        the case of one famous, European festival-guru who frequently claims to have
  ‘discovered’ Chinese cinema, a feat which presumably the Chinese people
        themselves had never previously managed! – this ethos is on the tip of being
        snuffed out altogether today, when an increasing number of festivals exhibit a
        decreasing circle of ‘must see’ World Cinema titles. Is there anything left to
        discover? Of course there is: in every country, every ‘market’, every period of
        the past, every pocket of culture. We need to become
        curious, again, about what we don’t know and haven’t seen or yet heard about in
        any way, shape or form. And we desperately need to individuate our work, our
        research, our knowledge, and finally ourselves, in and through this search.
   
         There is
        something both nostalgic and provocative in this idea of discovering a
        little-known, unsung or completely obscure film. In these days of streaming,
        downloading and torrents, the idea of actually fossicking for and buying a DVD
        or VHS in this manner may already be an obsolete notion, a thing of the past.
        But it is a fundamentally different experience for a cinephile to discover a film when she or he is not consciously choosing to watch something they already know about. Rather, the Two Dollar Movie project is a reflection
        on what it means to take a chance on something we cannot predict, that we may
        never have heard of before … and to see where that blind chance takes us.
   
         Eight
        extracts from the project appeared, in Dutch translation, as Two Euro Movie in De Filmkrant, issue 391 (September/October
        2016, pp. 50-53), and on the magazine’s website. This LOLA version is complete and
          unexpurgated; whenever somebody provided an image, we have used that, too. We
          thank everyone who contributed, and especially Dana Linssen for setting the ball rolling.
   
         Adrian Martin, October 2016
               
 | 
| © Adrian Martin, October 2016. Cannot be reprinted without permission of the author and editors. |